Try the new Acol, SAYC and SEF daylongs

More robot systems added, catering to more diverse bridge tastes than ever before

Two new games have recently joined our growing family of multi-system daylongs; the SEF and SAYC Daylongs. Here's a quick rundown of the systems on BBO to try your hand at:

Whichever Daylong you try, you'll have up to 24 hours to finish playing a tournament of 8 boards, some are scored using MP and others IMPs. You can register, play at your own pace, leave the table, then resume the game any time during the day without losing your results.

The choice of systems is diversifying - maybe it's time you had a go at something new?

Log in to BBO, click Competitive > All tournaments and type 'daylong' into the search box to find the game you'd like to try.

44 comments on “Try the new Acol, SAYC and SEF daylongs”

  1. I enjoy plaing with robots and you can learn a lot from them. When robot bids something that you are thinking is not correct your first bid is wrong !!!
    ♥ the KEY for better bridge is discipline ... Simple ♥

      1. Hi Joseph,
        Thank you for your suggestions; we'll take it into consideration. Hope you're still enjoying playing with the other robot systems that are available. 🙂

  2. I'm very unsatisfied with GIB 2/1 too. GIB bids bad, I'd argue that other than dummy play it's just awful . Could we have better robot, with higher system complexity pls?

  3. Suggesting the biggest improvement of all. Please add the following 2 lines of code on top of the program:

    IF CONTRACT = NT
    THEN RETURN PARTNER'S SUIT

  4. I'm ALWAYS afraid to DBL (penalty) a bit because my robot 'P' always rebids !

    Some games ,my robot partner sabotages my bids (it shouldn't be a self destruct situation)

    The robots CHEAT in some cases - (when they play as a pair against you).

    However, I appreciate the fact that we can play using the tools given to us AND the robots teach you some hard lessons.

    I'm a better player as a result .....

    1. Yes it is. Stayman is used to invite to 2NT, and doesn't require a 4 card major. 1NT-2C/2H-2S shows 4S and an invite, and 1NT-2C/2H-2NT denies 4 cards in either major.

  5. I would just wish that the GIBS would draw trumps first more often so they dont fail to get the contract which was there.

      1. That depends on what kind of tournament you're playing. The robot does declare, for example in the Robot Rewards. (I think the comment what directed towards GiB in general on not just daylongs)

  6. Before putting in new basic bidding systems, try fixing the ones that are there. And yeah.... Defensive signalling would greatly improve robot defenses, which are awful. And for Christ's sakes, stop telling the robots lo lead singleton Kings and Queens in trump. Just because the double dummy program says it will fall does not mean it will fall in real play

    1. Right on!
      Trouble is there hasn’t been ANY upgrade in several years nor is it likely there will be. The present management is interested in taking your money period!! Nothing else matters to them.

  7. Way too many unnecessary, unhelpful, and confusing cue bids from North. Several times, after arriving at what seems to be an appropriate and comfortable 3NT contract, North will then give me a “cue” of 4 clubs, notifying me they hold 4+ clubs and less than 8 HCP. This is useless information! And if I want to get the bid back into NT and bid 4NT the robot takes that as Blackwood in clubs. Now what?

  8. If Bridge Baron "robots" can bid fairly accurately based on the detailed convention card you set up for them, why can't BBO robots do the same thing? Having to carefully look at the meaning of a robot bid and then have to select around to find the closest bid you can make to match the meaning you are trying to give the robot is a pain.

  9. What's the difference between ACOL and SAYC?
    Is SAYC simpler or more intiitive? Are the bid meanings different? Which is better for a beginner?
    Thanks!!

    1. Basically Acol is 4 card majors with weak NT, while SAYC is 5 card majors with strong NT. Both have advantages and disadvantages. What you really need to consider is who you are likely to partner at bridge, and what system that they play, especially if you may play face to face bridge in the future. If you live in the US then SAYC will be a better choice; if in the UK then Acol will be better. In addition local bridge clubs may well provide classes in the popular system where you live.

  10. robots need to discrinate between a push and an invite. After a suit is agreed, a one level raise should not be an invite unless no intermediate bid is available.

  11. Agree - fix the current robots both bidding and defense! Every day there are so many stupid robot bids - bid when they shouldn't, don't bid when they should. It's hard to even play sometimes. I'm not talking about adding a level of expertise, just do something that's normal.

  12. It is not good for bridge to have BBO charge $2.99 for the use of robots. It discourages people to play and practice. Maybe $2.99 for a month, but not a week. And that's the dumber robots!

    1. My question is what do you get by upgrading the robots? Especially if you are playing against all there robots? Your robot is smarter and signals and the other two robots stay robot-stupid, or all are upgraded... I can't find any definition of this upgrade.

    1. I wish there was an app that you key in your convention card and the robot partner helps you practice your own convention card.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 2 3 112
cruzmenú