Dear BBOers, have a go at this bidding problems. Your overall score will be displayed, along with the correct answers once you’ve complete the exercise. Good luck!
This article was originally published in Bridgerama+.
Click here to subscribe to Bridgerama+
This article was originally published in Bridgerama+.
Click here to subscribe to Bridgerama+
If you want more exercice about bidding, you can find below another Quiz
not useful
I am embarrassed to have my name attributed to this quiz. the questions and answers don't make sense. the presentation is awful.
I don't recall writing this quiz. And I don't like it.I don't like the choices or the questions or fhe way the answers are displayed.
I don't remember writing this quiz. But it says that I did. I don't like the quiz. I don't like some of the possible answers. And I certainly don't like that you don't get the answer along with the hand and that you have to wait until the end.
would be helpful to see the hands with answers
Would really like to see hands with answer…can’t remember. I’m old …senior moments apply
I am in the same boat. Please consider. Thank you.
me too
It would be very helpful to see the questions/hands with the answers. Otherwise a useful exercise. Thank you.
I saw no hands. Can't bid in a vacuum, LOL
jordymil
Useless without knowing agreements. For example, we play responsive doubles?
Yes, there's quite a learning gap without a repeat of the hands to view along with the answers!
It would be useful to have the hands and bidding shown again with the answers. Maybe next time lol.
No hands to compare
The recommended actions assume partnership understanding that the Double is conventional in all such cases. That shouldn't be taken for granted!
In contemporary bridge it's rightfully assumed that a 150 honours in their suit rarely happen. In all provided cases, a constructive X is preferred. If you happened to have their trump stuck, wait for a reopening X.
Thanks for replying. However, in cases such as Problem 1, Larry himself has written that the meaning of X is a matter for partnership discussion - see https://www.larryco.com/bridge-learning-center/print/28 . On this particular deal, I'd be tempted to bid 2D to invite partner to pick a major (trusting partner to recognise that the opponents almost certainly have more HCP between them than we do).