Hand of the day #241
The Aces On Bridge by Bobby Wolff What do you think the result of a heart contra...
The Aces On Bridge by Bobby Wolff
You and I play that weak twos promise six cards. But some people are less rigid.
In today’s deal a difference of opinion as to the minimum required for a nonvulnerable weak-two opening led to South declaring a dreadful four-heart contract.
Opening Lead: ♣K
West led the club king, East playing the five and South the four. Obviously the contract would have been beaten easily had West continued clubs and given East a ruff. However, it seemed more likely to West that East’s club five was from an original holding of 10-5-3-2, in which case such a defense would merely establish dummy’s queen. So at trick two West switched to the spade 10.
Declarer won the ace and drew trumps in three rounds. He then played a club toward dummy’s queen. West won and, still thinking South held the doubleton club, continued with a second spade. (A third club would disrupt the timing for the squeeze that followed, but one can hardly blame West for failing to work out what was about to happen.)
East won the spade eight and continued with the spade king. Declarer ruffed, and West, to his intense irritation, found himself squeezed in the minor suits.
If he discarded a diamond, declarer would cash dummy’s top diamonds and ruff a diamond, establishing the eight; the club queen would be the entry card to reach it. If West discarded a club, his jack would fall under declarer’s queen and declarer would still have a trump to reach his club winner.
Bid with the aces
Answer: Pass
The general rule when you are deciding whether to compete further is that high cards alone are not enough. Here, having your values in your long suits is a plus, but your guarded club queen may work on defense and be useless to you as declarer. With a likely 4-4 spade fit only (and the chance of a bad split), pass and hope to set three clubs.
This Hand of the Day was originally published on aces.bridgeblogging.com.
